Home » Economics
Email This Post | Print this post

Rewarding incompetence? Well, who is John Galt.

Published: 4 April 2009 by CA

I am "CA" Atreya (PMP, MBA), the author of this blog. I help businesses in Atlantic Canada achieve their BHAG successfully. You may subscribe to this blog using a feed reader (RSS).

If you recognize the question, “Who is John Galt?” then you have no doubt read Ayn Rand’s “Atlas Shrugged”. This question portrays a sense of helplessness and despair in her novel as the government suppresses free private enterprise in the name of “public good”. With each passing day, did you not notice the things that are being done in the interest of the “public good”. Are we traveling down the same path as mentioned in Rand’s book? The similarities are striking.

Short term stock returns

Some CEOs of big businesses are starting to ignore the long term value generated and focus on stock market returns. The stock market has become the barometer of an organization’s success instead of the value provided to its customers. Remember James Taggart and how Francisco disrupts his wedding party?

Rewarding incompetence with bail-out money

Businesses should bear the responsibility of their actions. When, as an individual, I make financial decisions that could force me to declare bankruptcy, then why not the banks and financial institutions. Liquidate the insolvent banks piecemeal and let a new responsible and smarter system arise out of its ashes. Recall how, in the book, incompetent businesses were granted subsidies and the industrialist who invented a new metal was forced into giving it up for “public good”.

Regulation

This sends me over the edge. Every time I hear someone say, “we need better regulation!” Do people really think that regulation is the answer to all our woes. Think of all the regulations imposed on Dagny Taggart, the railroad owner and an enterprising industrialist in Atlas Shrugged, in the name of public good. Regulation and government intervention is not the answer to the crisis.

Regulation is a means by which the government will take more money from my pocket. In corrupt countries regulations are used to create barriers for business. It is impossible to do business without breaking the regulations.

Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany rejected Mr. Obama’s plea for other nations to follow America’s lead and pledge greater fiscal spending to stimulate their economies. She said more spending was not worth debating. “That is not a bargaining chip,” she said, adding, by contrast, “Regulation is something that is in everyone’s interest.” Need I say more? Who is John Galt?

Taxes

What better way to get out of a recession than to put money in people’s pockets! New Brunswick seems to understand that where the Premier Shawn Graham promises to lower personal income taxes to 9% and 12%. I say abolish taxes totally with immediate effect. Imagine the money the government will be putting into people’s pockets. It is a more comforting thought that the government is in deficit due to taxes rather than doling out bailout money to incompetent businesses.

According to a data (a bit old - 2005) tax revenue for Canada was around 34% of the GDP, the US about 25% of the GDP, France was about 43% of its GDP. According to the CIA World Factbook, Canada’s GDP in 2008 is estimated to be at 1.5 trillion dollars and estimated US GDP is $14.2 trillion. A reduction in taxes by even 10% across the board should provide the fuel growth. But no, President Obama is talking about raising taxes and his budget is being approved at the time of this writing.

So, do you think that the US, and subsequently the world, will slide into anarchy that Rand penned in her book? The path we have started traveling down on certainly suggests that end. It’s too soon to tell. Hopefully, there’s a light at the end of the tunnel and its not that of an oncoming train.

[Update]: You might be interested-
Obama turns left
Obama doesn’t get roots of crisis

Bookmark and Share
Other articles filed under Economics categories.

4 Comments »

  • Hal said:

    This will make you laugh or pull your hair out. Maybe both.

    Congressional Panel Suggests Firing Managers, Liquidating Banks

    This is crazy. Our free market society was supposed to liquidate these bad banks to begin with. That’s what it does with failed businesses. It’s what keeps the markets strong and thriving. Should have liquidated them to begin with. No business or country for that matter is too big to fail.

    What’s too bad is I doubt that the advice of liquidating them will be heeded.

    My guess is that it won’t be too much longer till all that money they printed leads to inflation. Which should be good for the gold and silver markets and ETFs.

    ExactPrice shows gold’s been falling but I think that’s because the IMF announced their intentions of selling some 400 tonnes I think it was. We’ll see if that takes place but I think it’s probably a good to time in light of this news that the government really is clueless to see about finding some hard currency.

    Which reminds me of all the local governments now printing their own currencies. That’s pretty telling if you ask me.

  • CA said:

    No, Hal, there are too many vested interests in action to allow to incompetence to fail. America has long tread away from the path of a total free economy. But it was (is??) still the world’s most free economy.

    It will be interesting to watch the specter of inflation zoom once credit starts flowing … dramatic increase in interest rates … and again a stronger dollar with all its deficits …

    One day at a time, Hal, one day …

  • Hal said:

    I still have to disagree with you about “too big to fail.” There’s always vested interests and the outcome is going to be painful. But we can’t go on rewarding wrong headed thinking and actions. That just leads to further companies and people to do the same wrong headed business schemes for short term payouts and then cut and running for big brother to clean up the mess and take over. And big brother isn’t qualified.

  • CA said:

    If the US were truly a free economy, large insolvent businesses would have filed for bankruptcy a long time ago. It’s only the SMEs who are not getting any bail out.

    Look at the forest industry - they are not getting any money. The inefficient mills are shutting down all over the map over the last 2-3 years. In fact in Canada, the forestry sector used to employ more individuals than the auto industry. But the forestry companies did not get the bail out. Do you know why? This is because of the softwood lumber agreement between Canada and the US. The US will cry foul if any bail-outs were handed out to the forestry industry.

    But the same US thinks the auto industry is too big to fail and it pumps in money even though GM and Chrysler have been in dumps for a long time now. Worse, they expect Canada to follow suit.

    If we were in a completely free economy with market forces at play, I would agree with you 100%. But with all the US government intervention that I am seeing (AIG bonus issue, GM/Chrysler & union negotiation interference) I have to say that good money will be thrown after the bad by the big brother. It is big brother running the show now.

    Heck, the bonuses at Freddie and Fannie were more than AIG, but not one peep from the government or the public!

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.